Call waiting
Posted in Culture, Social Media on May 22nd, 2009 by glen – Comments
I remember when “call waiting” was introduced by our local phone company in the late 1970’s. It was considered a really useful technology, in that, if you were waiting for an important call, you could still take other calls in the mean time. However, as our society became ever more obsessed with newer, faster, more immediate gratification, it revealed its dark side: it made people rude.
At some point, we (our society) decided that it was much more important to talk to the new, exciting, and (as yet) unknown person who was calling us, than to continue talking with the living, breathing, and oh-so-real person that we were already conversing with.
It reflects an obsessive belief that “newer must be better” and that “I need to find out what’s happening” rather than “continuing the existing conversation.” Of course, when you state it bluntly like that, it’s rather obvious what’s happening.
Fast forward thirty years, and Steven Hodson is commenting on the real-time web:
At what point did the quality of opinion and thoughtful discourse become less important than knowing the minute something happened in the world in a 140 characters or less? Just how is all this real-time web making it any easier to find and/or share content of value when we have to spend so much time just watching stuff go by on Twitter and Friendfeed because we might miss something?
Today, it’s not just telephone calls that get relegated to the back burner when someone new appears; News itself is being overwhelmed by fast-breaking, often faulty real-time transmission of information. By forcing people to respond in 140-character chunks, Twitter and its ilk have compressed an already soundbite-oriented culture into something of an incoherent scream.
As I’ve
I’ve recently converted all of my blogs to run on the